“Formulise your procurement process to result in better informed purchases based on risk assessment.”Ĭonvincing that your department is worthwhile of investment is never an easy task, particularly in a moment of high inflation, so securing senior management buy-in is crucial. “Review your process for purchasing equipment are you giving enough proactive consideration to it, so you’re not just buying cheap?” She advised. This estimates there are 600m cases of foodborne disease globally each year leading to 420,000 deaths – that equates to 6% of all contamination being a consequence of equipment and environment, and around 20,000 deaths attributed to poor cleaning. She referenced 2018 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data to give the importance of cleaning further weight. “Ineffective equipment caged off so that no one can get to it.” “I still see hygienically designed equipment poorly installed,” she sighed. For example, what’s the point in having great equipment if it is difficult to dismantle and clean? While Satterthwaite noted investment into innovation is key, she affirmed that it needed to be well considered. Innovation doesn’t just come in the form of statistics and predictive analysis, however, it is also in our design, as Katie Satterthwaite, M&S factory standards manager pointed out in her address. “Who knows when the next political instability will occur what’s going to happen with climate change?” Kyriakides raised.īut for us to hold onto that hope and navigate our uncertain future, industry must embrace and invest in tech. These solutions have been and will continue to help improve data analysis and predict risks in the future – a helpful attribute as events appear to be becoming more ferocious and widespread. However, he was cautiously optimistic that the future remains bright as a result of impressive technological advances. The recent pressures Kyriakides referred to are well known to the sector, from the challenges of Covid and conflict, to the impact of Brexit and inflation. The system is overloaded with pressures and this is why these events happen.” “So why do I say that consumer risk is still as present as it ever was? Because we have recent examples of people who have died, of food that has caused outbreaks, contaminated with undeclared allergens and chemicals. “Today, we have a very strong regulatory and enforcement environment and some of the most advanced analytical techniques and controls. “High level controls didn’t exist before these incidents. The FSI Conference saw an expert group of food safety experts come together to lend their insights These notable moments have steered our legislative framework – albeit with less violent consequences than, for example, a medieval Turkey (circa 1400) ruling which mandated a baker giving false weight for his bread would have his ear nailed to his door. “When I started my career in the 80s, it coincided with an extraordinary number of food crises – eggs and Salmonella, Listeria in ready meals, E.Coli in beef, botulism.” He added. “The 1800s was probably when crime and adulteration were at their highest in the UK, with a number of big events occurring,” Kyriakides suggested, citing the Bradford sweets poisoning incident of 1858, wherein arsenic was accidentally added into confectionery, as an example. Egyptians and Romans were the forefathers of food crime, perhaps. “When you look at our ancestors, you can guarantee foodborne diseases were around since we walked the Earth. “The consumer risk is the same as it ever was, but we understand them better,” Kyriakides said. Opening the forum, independent food safety consultant, Alec Kyriakides, gave a historic overview of how food risk has shaped our food safety regulations and controls and the important role technology will play in strengthening our response.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |